Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yolk plug

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. moink 04:49, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Yolk plug

Has been moved to Wiktionary. KeithD (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Isn't it speedy then~? Punkmorten 19:50, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Only if it previously had a VfD which mandated a transwiki, per WP:CSD A5.
    • It ought to be. That's silly. We should be able to speedy transwikis if we can give the link to where they've been put. Anyway, delete. [[User:Premeditated Chaos|User:Premeditated Chaos/Sig]] 07:41, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
      • On the contrary, it's sensible. Your idea would make the transwiki system into a backdoor deletion mechanism. Deletion should take the normal routes. This was the subject of discussion during the recent expansion of the speedy deletion criteria. Please read the discussion. Uncle G 11:26:58, 2005-09-11 (UTC)

Not enough discussion for consensus, reposting- Fernando Rizo T/C 04:08, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep, no reason for deletion given. Thanks for reposting Fernando. Kappa 08:44, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Ouch. There is a better chance that someone will improve this substub on amphibian development than anyone will take a second look at any of the sch**l entries that are routinely kept with no consensus. Pilatus 12:05, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
    • LOL not only do school articles improve wikipedia's coverage of education, they also help to protect its coverage of amphibian developmental biology. Kappa 13:17, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
      • To keep non-notable schools serves a function only by satisfying extreme inclusionists and (sometimes) people who attend the schools themselves. Most others either don't care or see them as obviously non-encyclopedic. / Peter Isotalo 13:47, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. This does not require a separate article. /Peter Isotalo 13:47, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep You learn something everyday, I just did from that short article. Alf melmac 18:48, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. I am sure that more could be said about these. Capitalistroadster 00:07, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.