Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yihan Chen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:01, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yihan Chen

Yihan Chen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I know that there is assertion that he's been referred to by several newspapers -- but is this really more than 15 minutes of fame? I don't think the article establishes persistent notability. Unless notability is further shown, delete. --Nlu (talk) 22:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep, if more reliable sources are added, and if the author lengthens the article. Dwilso 22:48, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Keep. I added two references and there were more. This little guy is pretty notable and likely to become more so as he ages. Renee (talk) 00:11, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

• Strong keep - The fact that the editor proposing deletion did not take the 40 seconds it would have taken to notify the article's creator shows bad faith, and reinforces the suspicion that this is a disruptive proposal. Badagnani (talk) 03:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
  • The fact that this editor makes an optional notification supposedly mandatory shows that this keep vote is disruptive. --Nlu (talk) 03:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Looks notable to me. Please, assume good faith. Also, nobody's notified the article creator still; I will do so. They're an SPA, so this might be an autobio, but the subject is notable nonetheless. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 04:43, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per references in article. --Bardin (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.