Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellowknife dump

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was article sent to Wikipedia:Copyright problems. howcheng {chat} 22:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Yellowknife dump

Speedy deletion. Appears to consist entirely of copyrighted text from New York Times, International Herald Tribune, or both, plus a warning not to delete the page. Kragen Sitaker 05:08, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

• If this had been caught within the 48 hour window, I would have speedily deleted it. The article is a straight copyvio of an International Herald Tribune news article. The copyright infringer was even good enough to preserve the IHT copyright notice. Uncle G 05:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Copyvio. Capitalistroadster 08:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment This has been previously delted. Could an admin check the previous content and see if it's the same copyvio? If so, can be speedied as db-repost. Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 12:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I already checked. The previously deleted content was patent nonsense, just random letters, not this. Uncle G 18:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.