Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellowikis 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete --Angr/tɔk tə mi 19:45, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Yellowikis
- Yellowikis was nominated for deletion on 2005-09-02. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior AFD discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellowikis.
NN, D. ComCat 01:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Not much seems to have changed since the last AfD, and it was on the border of notable then, but not much seems to have changed since the last AfD, and the result of that was Keep. I don't expect anything to change here except perhaps a discussion on bias towards fellow wikis. Many of them are notable, although there are a few(such as Wiki Gonzalez), that are mostly jibberish in Wiki software. Karmafist 02:20, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - The previous AfD shows that it is: a) spam and b) hardly notable. If it were to become notable, fine, but as it is the founder is on record as saying he put the article there so he could advertise in other articles. Not a good idea, IMO. Sunray 03:01, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, still not notable. --fvw* 04:24, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Sunray. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 04:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree w/Sunray Dottore So 10:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
- Keep A useful expansion of the wiki movement, and worthy of an article on that basis. Denni☯ 00:28, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- keep as per User:Denni Roodog2k (Hello there!) 15:04, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.