Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Year 60,056 problem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy BJAODN to User:Shalom/Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense/Year 60,056 problem. Shalom ^Hello 17:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Year 60,056 problem

Year 60,056 problem (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No article needed. UtherSRG (talk) 16:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

delete - unlike the the 2037 and 10000 problem, there is no assertion why this would ever become a practical problem, and the fact is already mentioned in NTFS. Han-Kwang 16:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete silly (nn, unsourced). JJL 17:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge back somewhere. Maybe Year 2000 problem or something. Verifiable topic but it is a bit on the esoteric side. Arkyan • ^(talk) 17:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.