Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yavneh Day School (Cincinnati, Ohio)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). WilliamH (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yavneh Day School (Cincinnati, Ohio)

Yavneh Day School (Cincinnati, Ohio) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, no WP:RS cited. Bstone (talk) 17:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. —Bhaktivinode (talk) 17:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Nobable. Also, sources do exist. For example, [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. Thanks. Bhaktivinode (talk) 17:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 18:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect to Education in Cincinnati per established precedent. Notability has not been established in the article. I don't have access to the full text of the sources but the summaries are not sufficient to indicate notability. TerriersFan (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC) Sufficient improvements have been made for the page to be a Keep. TerriersFan (talk) 15:03, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Hi TerriersFan: Please see the entirely reworked expanded article now eith reliable sources added. In any case, it would make no sense to "merge" a private Jewish day school with an article about a general topic that covers all of education in Cincinnati. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Leaning toward merge per TerriersFan. School's restroom apparently won an award for design. Established and overseen by notable people per Google News search. Needs more evidence of notability. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep (change of vote) per improvements to article and other available coverage. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, only links are lists of schools that all schools have. There is no real media coverage. AlbinoFerret (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Hi Albino: The article started as a stub about 24 hours ago and it has been fully expanded since then. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete As the article is written now, it is nothing more than a listing of the school, and is not notable. Avi (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Hi Avi: It's been re-written fully. Take a look. IZAK (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Keep Article has been vastly improved by IZAK, and demonstrates notability sufficient for wikipedia. -- Avi (talk) 19:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as this article was only created less than 24 hours before this nomination. It was also marked with two stubs templates ({{edu-stub}} and {{Judaism-stub}}) to alert any editors who chance upon it that it needs help, but not deletion. It's part of understanding Jewish life and the updated History of the Jews in Cincinnati because Jewish schools, like synagogues, are the central core of Jewish life of any vibrant and dynamic community. The article was split off from Yavneh Day School (Los Gatos, California) which was improved, and now this article will be improved. The nominator is requested not be hasty in the future, but to seek help in improving such articles rather than having them deleted. The article is part of Category:Jews and Judaism in Cincinnati and Category:Jews and Judaism in Ohio and like most articles relating to Jews and Judaism must be seen in perspective that the numbers of Jews are small in relation to the general population (6 million vs 300 million in the USA) and should be granted no less consideration than soccer players and their teams that have articles about them in the thousands and noone complains. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• NOTE: The article has now been fully expanded to show its importance and notability with multiple sources. The nominator is kindly requested to reconsider. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep, notable due to historical background, among other things. --MPerel 20:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep: Article is too new to delete if there's a reasonable chance of notability, and the length of the article (post-expansion) seems to indicate that. I read the article but haven't reviewed the sources yet so I have no opinion toward future !votes. CRGreathouse (t | c) 15:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:Hey. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 05:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Meets Notability requirements; has outside sources other than School website.AJseagull1 (talk) 22:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.