Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yarukku Yaaro (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 10:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Yarukku Yaaro

Yarukku Yaaro (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Article fails to meet WP:N as nothing other than straight sporks from the film are included. Additionally per WP:NF the artilce fails to inclide most (if not all) of the following guidelines: No external sources are quoted which establidh the notability. There is niether of a Publication of at least two non-trivial articles, at least five years after the film's initial release. nor was the film was deemed notable by a broad survey of film critics, academics, or movie professionals, when such a poll was conducted at least five years after the film's release. Or at least in the 10 or so days since the article was created they have failed to turn up. Additionally there appear to be no mention of any reviews by film critics. The whole artilce appears to be OR with all information from the film. Additionally it appears that the article has been speedied before under CS10 (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yarukku Yaaro and recreated. A previous speedy failed, and a prod was removed (perhapes in the mistaken belief it was a speed tag? see diff BigHairRef | Talk 18:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete unless coverage in reliable third party sources can be found. —Snthdiueoa (talk|contribs) 20:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per prior AfD, this time with added salt. PC78 (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails notability -- none of the artists have articles of their own. Also unreferenced with a lot of POV.-Ravichandar 03:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.