Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yang Fu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 08:10Z

[edit] Yang Fu

Yang Fu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unreferenced and article fails to meet WP:BIO requirements. Ozgod 01:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete per CSD A1 - no context. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 02:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • DeleteThis article is probably the most out of contexted biography ive ever seen. It took me a lot of looking at the other wikilinks to other ppl to even find the date/context of this persons life (2nd/3rd century). If another user is willing to expand the article, look online or elsewhere for some references and try and make the biography more notable than im willing to change my view, but for now its a delete.LordHarris 03:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

* Delete. Unclear whether real, but even if real not notable enough. --Nlu (talk) 05:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletions. -- Black Falcon 07:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Found reference in Records of the Three Kingdoms, his Chinese name is 楊阜 and has a whole biography to himself in Wei Book, vol 25. A complete rewrite is recommended. _dk 02:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Now that Deadkid dk pointed out that it's 楊阜, it's clearly notable. --Nlu (talk) 06:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Significant figure in Chinese history. May need expansion but not deletion. User:Dimadick
  • Keep Reasonably important figure in the Three Kingdoms. Shimeru 19:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, interesting historical stub. Give it time, if no more citations show up for the next time around, discuss again. Smee 21:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.