Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yab Yum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 01:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yab Yum

article seems intended to promote the brothel. Doesn't seem to be particularly notable in and of itself. Somebody removed db-spam tag. IPSOS (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. (Article was tagged with db-spam, then deleted, then restored by me and referenced.) Casual literature search reveals about 30 hits in the international press; almost all articles introduce the club as the "best-known" or "most exclusive" brothel of Amsterdam or even the Netherlands, establishing notability. I don't think a business has to be "particularly notable" to deserve an article. The charge "the article seems intended to promote the brothel" is too vague to allow for an answer. AxelBoldt 00:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, existence of nontrivial coverage indicates that it passes WP:CORP Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 01:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, well-referenced thanks to AlexBoldt. --Dhartung | Talk 01:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per comments above. Brothel is definitely notable. Chairman S. Talk ^Contribs 01:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. This has to stay as of details above. -- Michael Janich 03:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.