Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaacov Perrin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel Case 05:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yaacov Perrin

Yaacov Perrin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This person is totally not notable. Violates WP:NN. Many "rabbis" have delivered eulogies at the funerals of controversuial people, but that should not be the basis for launching articles about them which also violates WP:NOT#SOAPBOX. IZAK 09:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete for above reasons. IZAK 09:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no sources about the person, only two about the quote, and they barely say anything at all. Jon513 10:44, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete quote does not make notable. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 13:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, since the only references concerning the subject appear to relate to a controversial statement at a eulogy, fails Wikipedia:Notability (people). MPerel 15:37, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Doesn't prove its notability, as well there is no sources.--JForget 22:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep there was a news article in the times--tho only a subsequent letter to the editor is listed, (Also art in the Daily New Feb. 28, 1994, p.6, and other papers--and about 40,000 ghits. Notable bigots are notable. DGG (talk) 00:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete we don't even know that this guy actually exists. Letters to the editor are NOT proper sources. As per nom, it's unsourced soapboxing. <<-armon->> 23:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per <<-armon->> Abberley2 01:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Perrin may be notable, but his article doesn't even pretend to explain why. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 02:55, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.