Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y3K

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 00:00, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Y3K

'CSD or VFD? That's the question' said Hamlet :). Being serious, I don't know if this is worthy to keep --Neigel von Teighen 22:10, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• official abbreviation? What organization is the official creator of abbreviations? The author obviously doesn't have a clue that the Y2K problem has been replaced by the Y10K problem, not the Y3K problem. What's there is speculation and nonsense. Delete. RickK 22:27, Jan 29, 2005 (UTC)
• "There will be a big party"? Is this or is this not supposed to be an encyclopedia? Delete, or possibly redirect to 30th century. -R. fiend 22:34, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Mikkalai 22:43, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Complete silliness. Eric119 23:40, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Josh Cherry 00:56, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, original research. Megan1967 03:26, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. U$er 06:29, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.