Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xoanon Publishing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. The company doesn't seem notable in it's own right. I can't really see why Andrew D. Chumbley was kept, however, as the closing admin didn't leave an explanation as to why they kept the article. Consensus is to merge, to be frank I can't see enough info to merge though. Therefore, I'm doing a straight redirect. - Ta bu shi da yu 14:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Xoanon Publishing

Xoanon Publishing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

tiny company with very limited production, no history, and no particular uniqueness that warrants a page; submitted along with Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andrew_D._Chumbley Denial 06:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Non-notable company. Keb25 08:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. A Keep could be justified here on the basis that as a meta information resource, we should err on the side of inclusion of all verifiable information about present and former publishers and access to their works. Alternatively, if not kept, then a merge and redirect to Andrew D. Chumbley should be considered. Newyorkbrad 12:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
  • I'll accept the above suggestion of Newyorkbrad and propose a merge. CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

merge to Andrew Chumbley who is notable.Merkinsmum 20:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.