Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xmuzik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as non-notable band. Just zis Guy you know? 13:30, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xmuzik

Non-notable band that provides no indication of meeting WP:MUSIC. Previous {{prod}} was removed by article creator. --Allen3 ^talk 13:15, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. As per nom. 13,500 ghits [1], but not good considering that first five links are to band's official website, and the group's profile on myspace, purevolume, mp3.com and distinctiverecords.com. (Btw, their website appears to be no more than a list of links to their profiles elsewhere. Ugh.) — Kimchi.sg | Talk 14:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Henning Makholm 17:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 05:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:46, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• I've got just as much right to be here as any other band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xmuzik (talk • contribs)
  • No you don't. We have guidelines on what gets to stay here and what gets the boot. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 07:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: A7, no notability assertion for this band (a self-produced and distributed album does not count per WP:MUSIC). Wouldn't meet WP:MUSIC regardless. No rights here. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.