Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xie Qiuping

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. feydey 15:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xie Qiuping

• Delete , Way too short to be considered a serious entry.
• Delete , Not Notable Anonymous anonymous 15:18, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• keep if verifiable, as a world record is notable, otherwise delete. EsonLinji 03:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
• Yes, it is. Check out on the internet if you don't trust me--try TLHP (The Long Hair site) or TLHS (The long hair paradise) using yahoo or google to search. Keep, obviously, but the article needs to be expanded. Only extraordinary people can grow hair to such lengths: Check out Crystal Gayle or Alicia Witt's mother Diane for references. Mr Tan 17:38, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for non-notability. Wikipediaaddict 05:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Xie Qiuping does have an entry on the official Guinness World Records site [1] 15:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It is verified and I would consider a world-record holder to be a notable person. Hyenaste ^{[citation needed]} 22:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Any entry can be expanded and a valid world record holder is notable. Too short, is not a meaningful criteria, I began an article of similar length not long ago [2] that has now become the Featured Article Michael Woodruff. Cool3 01:25, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

keep - it is on the official guinness web site

• This nomination was incomplete, listing now. - Liberatore(T) 18:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep no case for deletion established. Obviously notable, obviously a stub. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 18:44, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - The nominator gave no reason for deletion. The article's subject is notable. Afonso Silva 18:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Hair. The subject is not notable for any reason beyond the length of her hair, and it's going to be hard to ever expand this beyond the current stub it is. Therefore, she deserves about two lines in the Hair article. I looked around and added a Reuters article which has something like 4 lines on her; that seems to be it. I don't think there will ever be more on this person. There is a precedent, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Hunn, which was merged into Burping after no keeps in a delete/merge no consensus. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 19:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Mr Tan and Hyenaste. I assume the first unsigned entry was by the nominator. Shortness of an article does not merit deletion, it merits a {{stub}} tag (preferrably within an appropriate stub category). Agent 86 20:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• keep please this world record holder is a notable person Yuckfoo 00:31, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, malformed nomination and figure is clearly notable. Silensor 20:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.