Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xiaoxuan

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 17:54, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Xiaoxuan

Currently a blank page, history is original research. PeepP 22:30, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete OR, maybe speedy (page was blanked by author). Jaxl | talk 22:41, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- if "original research" includes "heartfelt cry of anguish", then I guess that's a reason. I would have gone with a variant on "vanity" myself. Either way. Ben-w 22:46, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. — Stevey7788 (talk) 22:58, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• I'm inclined towards speedily deleting it on account of it reading as absolute nonsense. --IByte 23:00, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.