Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xerraire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 08:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xerraire

• Delete: Appears to be a non-notable artist. Everything I found on Google looked like either stuff created by her or references on little blogs, etc. Strikes me as someone with a nice camera and some web site expertise. I didn't see anything on WP:BIO that clearly fit. Nothing links to this page and there's no categories outside of her birth year. —Wknight94 (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep not much on Google but her work looks good to me. Keep as emerging artist? Dlyons493 Talk 19:55, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this non-notable Xerraire article and throw it out on its Derrierre. Ruby 20:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not much that isn't from her on google. When she's done "emerging" she can be re-added. If that ever happens... Liamdaly620 21:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• weak keep 24k google hits -- Astrokey44|talk 06:00, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: I think that's because "Xerraire" is a word in some language. I'd recommend taking a closer look at the actual results. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

• most of the first hits are for her, theres still 17k hits in english [1] -- Astrokey44|talk 00:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• Most of those are duplicates. [2] Johnleemk | Talk 08:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

• Strong Delete, not-notable vanity page. incog 18:34, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.