Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xenoarchy

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk July 3, 2005 21:48 (UTC)

[edit] Xenoarchy

Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Reason given was "original research; Google returns no hits". — Gwalla | Talk 02:46, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: all true, zero Google hits, appears to be 'original research'. Gblaz 02:55, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete original research, neologism. JamesBurns 04:15, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• "Xenarchy" gets lots of Google hits, but all that I looked at were not relevant (mostly screen names). Delete. -Sean Curtin 04:59, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as personal theory and non-notable: nobody has written a book on it, and it does not exist! Falcon 05:11, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research. --Misterwindupbird 06:08, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This is original research but I hope it finds a home somewhere off wikipedia - it is a clever idea. GabrielF 17:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn neologism. --Etacar11 20:08, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.