Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xemidi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 05:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xemidi and Zxyxy System

Xemidi, and the related Zxyxy System look like some sort of fictional universe. However there are no Ghits at all on any related terms such as "Calgonaric" (notably, Calgon is a water-softening product here in the UK), Xemidi or anything else. I'm listing this and Zxyxy System for deletion as their lack of verifiability makes them look like something made up in school Tonywalton  | Talk 12:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete – vanity. These articles were clearly written by Its Highness Xemidi Ralgomarack itself, who currently resides at DKIT (don't ask me what the "K" stands for – you don't want to know). Xemidi is vain to the highest degree and strongly biased, describing itself with exalted terms like "A great and cruel ruler". Gag this with a Zxyxy dinner fork. LambiamTalk 14:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and BJAODN; original fiction, but I liked the pictures. Smerdis of Tlön 15:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Hey Xemidi managed to get a couple of votes in the student election in the DKIT,even though he had originally started out as an antitdote to the many people who used about an entire rainforests worth of paper promoting themselves and the numerous promises they would never be able to keep.At least Xemidi spoke the truth.After that he took on a life of his own. WishIhadablog

  • Delete, crap. incog 01:55, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.