Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xeaus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was as follows:

Premature closing due to Speedy Delete criteria G7 (author requests deletion). As this is information based on a fanfiction without verifiability (and no direct google hits outside of Wikipedia itself), and the author of the material discussed is demanding deltion, I believe this falls under speedy deletion easily. Moreover, the clear concensus is delete. — Deckiller 06:01, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xeaus

I have removed the text from this article, so no further damage can be done. I want the text to remain deleted so I can protect my material. Roygene 04:23, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

This article was written by my brother, who operates under the name Caliente001, for the sole purpose of getting under my skin. Xeaus is a creation of my own for a book I am writing and should not be listed as a part of Star Wars. Roygene 19:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as entirely unreferenced. Molerat 20:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unreferenced, fanfic characters don't belong here. --Coredesat talk 21:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: fandom. — Deckiller 22:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• As with Amelico (AfD discussion), there is nothing to prove that this article wasn't made up from whole cloth directly in Wikipedia. Whether it is fan fiction or not is irrelevant. The article is simply unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G 14:19, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• What is the deal? WHY HASN'T THIS ARTICLE BEEN DELETED?!!! This material belongs to me and should not be listed as part of Wikipedia. These are my ideas that were stolen from me. I would question the policies of Wikipedia if they do not delete this article by tomorrow afternoon (June 30) at the latest. I want this articles deleted, or the text removed now. Roygene 03:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.