Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xbhp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 02:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Xbhp

advertisement for non-notable site. wikipediatrix 04:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

ATTENTION! If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

• Delete, nn website, fails WP:WEB. Kimchi.sg 09:05, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB and poor Alexa rank. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --P199 19:26, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam --Bachrach44 19:40, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. SorryGuy 23:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, low Alexa rank (144,991), article reads as advertisment. -- ReyBrujo 01:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Spam is too strong a word but we don't need articles on every web site. Runcorn 11:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.