Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XXXchurch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] XXXchurch

Anti-pornography website that does not meet WP:WEB. Previously deleted here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xxxchurch and recreated a couple of months later. This site was featured in an ABC news story and has been mentioned in a few newspaper articles, but most of the mentions are trivial (though a few are full page write ups). This is right on the cusp of WP:WEB. I'm nominating this as a procedural measure because this article is a recreation with no further information added since the article was deleted that makes a strong case per WP:WEB.--Isotope23 14:27, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete, already been deleted once. Protect it against re-creation this time. wikipediatrix 16:06, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete exactly per Wikipediatrix. Protection has become a must. Srose (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep, they seem to have recieved enough media coverage to establish notability. How many websites get on both the daily show and Good Morning America? "Multiple non-trivial media mentions" seems to be sufficient for notability, and this site definitely has that. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 02:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I really dont understand why this should be deleted?

So...the article should be deleted cause it's not a popular topic? Or are you against the principles of the site? - JP

• • Comment, Please read WP:WEB. This isn't a question of whether or not the topic is popular or if people agree with what the site is trying to accomplish (I actually quite like their T-Shirts). If you feel this site meets the WP:WEB guidelines, you should try to demonstrate which criteria this site meets (as User:Night Gyr did above).--Isotope23 11:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete CSD G4. It should be deleted because there was a vote before and it was deleted then, and nothing has been changed. Danny Lilithborne 00:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per others before me. Anomo 01:13, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as recreation of deleted material without any real change in circumstances. Carlossuarez46 20:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.