Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XXX Church

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (Talk) 13:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] XXX Church

XXX Church (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This church is non verifiable and non-notable per WP:CHURCH. Delete The only links are to within the church, google video's uploaded, and non-notable blogs. This seems more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article. Adam Riley Talk 17:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete - pretty much per what the nominator says. The article has no real references (that pass WP:RS) and the church doesn't seem notable. Jayden54 21:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn notable church, non verifiable and agree with nominator in all respects.--John Lake 21:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete one of many online ministries, nothing particularly notable about it, unusual name aside. Dragomiloff 22:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep 164 hits in US newspapers in the Factiva database since 2002. There are three articles focusing on this ministry in the Los Angeles Times archives [1]. 13 books with hits on Amazon.com[2](most of them passing mentions). Article needs proper referencing, but there's enough here for borderline notability in my opinion Bwithh 04:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WEB, just one of a zillion (not accurate ghit count) online ministries, this one with an odd name. SkierRMH,08:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete and salt Recreation of deleted material. Deleted in September of this year. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/XXXchurch Anomo 23:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • ””Strong Keep This Church is both notable and unique. It has crossed over into many platforms, from The Daily Show to ABC News as well as many notable newspapers. It also is the only church of it's kind. If a small Church like Westboro Baptist Church can have an article, then surely there is room for a church like XXX Church. And as far as verifiable, I believe it is. Check Lexis-Nexis.Derek Cormier 05:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
see my comment above for verifiability Bwithh 05:37, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete and salt per Anomo. Also previously deleted in February '06.[3]--Kubigula (talk) 04:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per utter lack of any reliable sources being cited. Sandstein 21:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.