Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XFessenden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. And all this time I thought it was a program that simulated Reginald Fessenden under X Windows. JIP | Talk 19:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] XFessenden

Delete; nonsense, likely typo Lockley 07:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Looking at the history of the article, I can safely say that I don't know what the hell is going on. It appears that Fessenden was moved to XFessenden, so that Fessenden could be redirected to Fessenden (disambiguation). Delete whatever the hell's here speedily as an empty article, as nobody's going to search for this, although it may require something complicated like a contributions merge back to Fessenden to comply with the GFDL (I think, I'm no legal professional). Does this make sense? -- Saberwyn - 08:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no content, no reason to put the 'X' in front of Fessenden -- Astrokey44|talk 10:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: Maybe a user thought he could rename a page to Fessenden which already existed by renaming that one first. Merge contribution history and delete XFessenden. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-18 11:24Z
• Speedy delete as empty article. The only content in the history is an edit war over which article a redirection should point to plus the move. -- JLaTondre 12:52, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.