Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wymondham learning

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE.

The votes were 7 delete, 3 keep. dbenbenn | talk 22:14, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wymondham learning

Insufficiently notable. -- Curps 20:30, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, adult learning centres are not inherently encyclopedic. Wyss 21:08, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• I did some cleanup on it, the format is better but now it is a bit short because I removed extraneous material. I think it is notable enough, but now it needs expansion. (I'll go back and mark it stub). RJFJR 21:56, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Kudos for a good cleanup, much improved. However, surely there thousands of adult learning centres? What makes this one in particular encyclopedic? --Lawlore 22:24, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, article needs expansion. Megan1967 03:19, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I've categorised it. Philip 04:00, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• "{{placename}} learning {{subst:buzzword}} is a local organization for learning in {{subst:placename}}". Despite RJFJR's worthy efforts, notability is simply not established. Delete. Uncle G 02:16, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC)
• Keep. Plenty of room for expansion and organic growth to build Wikipedia as a truly great online encyclopedia. GRider\^talk 17:35, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Still reads like a promotional brochure. Anyway, that isn't a reason for deleting it, since it could be cleaned up more. A place that has computers and an Internet connection and offers some courses to adults (apart from language classes and woodworking, the subjects aren't mentioned, but gerbils and hamsters have something to do with them). Belongs to some kind of association of the same, where they give each other awards. Doesn't have notability written all over it to my eyes. --BM 01:37, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Completely lacking in notability/significance HowardB 09:17, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Advertising. delete. RickK 07:45, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.