Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Www.cardomain.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed because the article was boldly redirected. — brighterorange (talk) 20:17, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Www.cardomain.com

Spam. Hojl 01:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep — Not _really_ spam: lots of websites have articles. 869,000 hits on Google, i say it should stay :) --Deon555^talk_Review 01:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Cardomain. Notable site, redundant article. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 02:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect per above. -Elmer Clark 02:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect, as most of the content reads as breeching NPOV. Website has an alexa rank of 2,500... not bad! Given that we already have the material and a redirect will almost certainly happen, can we get this closed now? LinaMishima 03:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or redirect most of the article is POV or unsourced claims, either way it's not right for Wikipedia. The only neutral information in the article is the part about when the company was founded. _{talk to} JD ^{wants e-mail} 03:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete NN. Provide something besides the website itself to show it's notability. Has it been mentioned anywhere such as car magazines or television shows? Also, the information in the article needs to be sourced if it's going to stay. -Shazbot85^Talk 07:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Cardomain. This is a pretty large and well-known auto website, with an Alexa rank of 2521, but the current version is a redundant version and not written in an encyclopedic tone. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as above Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 10:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I just redirected it to Cardomain. Almost all the information was nearly word-for-word the same. Anyone can do a redirect, it's quite simple really. Just type #, then REDIRECT with no spaces, then do a standard link to the destination. No need for everyone to "vote" redirect in an AFD if it's obvious that's what should be done... be like Nike and "Just do it!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by ONUnicorn (talk • contribs)
  • Normally, once an article is up for deletion we don't take any action until the comment period has passed. But, I agree this is an obvious redirect. — brighterorange (talk) 20:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.