Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wu Guanzhong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wu Guanzhong

Wu Guanzhong (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Reads like resumé. The lack of a Chinese Wikipedia article makes it, I think, clear that the superlatives in the article are hyperbole, and that in turn makes notability questionable. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 04:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

• Strong keep - it took all of a few seconds to find [1], [2], [3]. I want to assume good faith, but did the nominator consider tagging this with a notability concern, or, perhaps, checking Google News first? Sorry, that was rude - but this article was relatively easy to confirm the notability of. - Bilby (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep per Bilby. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 10:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep I think most of us have heard of the British Museum, and, yes, he did have his paintings exhibited there Mandsford (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep notability established by Bilby's sources and the British Museum. KnightLago (talk) 16:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per easily available reliable source coverage TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 19:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Keep per Bilby. Online sources are plentiful.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 00:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.