Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wryn Vance (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:52, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wryn Vance

This article was deleted 13 months ago Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wryn Vance and restarted 4 months ago. It has been subject to two recent attempts at provisional deletion, which were quickly blanked out by a new user Brianwbrown. The article is unsourced and vain. Recommend that this be deleted, and possibly protected against recreation. Caerwine Caerwhine 10:40, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, not a repost (substantially reworded and expanded), but unsourced. Kimchi.sg 11:17, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Verifiability is the policy —Nearly Headless Nick 11:25, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- Earle Martin [t/c] 12:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable vanity article. --Xrblsnggt 19:48, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm from Auburn and I've never heard of him. Certainly non-notable. - Lissoy 20:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep He's a rising star in sports broadcasting. Either keep him now or add him in five years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.72.35 (talk • contribs) 04:11, 25 July 2006
  • Keep If you delete this, you'll be sorry when he's calling college football on CBS in about 5 years —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.241.86.117 (talk • contribs) 04:21, 26 July 2006
  • Delete If he is broadcasting for CBS in 5 years, the entry can be recreated. But if he is broadcasting for CBS in 5 years, it will be because CBS is in that bad of a shape. - collimd 13:25, 26 July 2006 (CT US)
    • Comment Previous unsigned comment from an unregistered editor came from the same IP address (66.32.72.35) that improperly removed the AFD notice from the article yesterday (since restored). Caerwine Caerwhine 04:10, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.