Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Writersmuster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Writersmuster

NN forum. Prod removed by author. Fails WP:WEB. --Onorem 13:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete G11; original author of the article Miccas (talk • e-mail • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) appears to be a regular poster at this articles website[1] whom appears to be working together with the owner of the website Christopher Ticehurst (got speedied) whom is in fact Christicehurst (talk • e-mail • contribs • page moves • block user • block log). He has already edited the article. Vanity. Tagged.--Andeh 16:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as spam and vanity per Andeh, but I don't think this is blatant enough for G11; with a couple sentences scrubbed out, it would be a fairly neutral presentation. Still, clearly vanity, NN forum, et cetera, so delete. Mangojuice^talk 17:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as notable as my fingernail clippings. Danny Lilithborne 21:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non notable. Nuttah68 09:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.