Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wranglers 04

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Userfied and deleted. -- Longhair 05:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wranglers 04

WP:VAIN created by User:Wranglers_04. Claim to fame is "one of the more prominent message board posters"; google of the message board returns 104 hits. Prod removed by IP w/no comment. --Jamoche 23:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete and userfy The article does not assert notability- which is obvious, because there is no notability. Make it his userpage and get rid of it now. But, in the user's defense, I give him credit for being such a big fan of the AFL. -- Kicking222 23:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable (WP:BIO).--blue520 00:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete and userfy per above. Unless an individual is covered by independent news media, the subject is non-notable per WP:BIO. --Elkman 19:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • As A fellow poster on the AFL Boards, I feel there is no problem with this page. No Need for deletion.- aflbeat88 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flyers2thecup88 (talk • contribs)
  • DO NOT DELETE!!! - Furry4 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.198.176.145 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete and userfy. Not close to notable. DarthVader 22:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Support. Keep it! (Rallybird4preds) #REDIRECT --GBVrallyCI 00:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep the page, I have no personal problem with it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilg4981 (talk • contribs)
  • Keep. -- It's cool with me(BigBadVooDooDaddy) Chalmation 00:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delate per top Landeyda 06:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment additons and alterations by User:166.109.0.185 (Irvington High School) have been removed, blanking of users comments is seen as vandalism.--blue520 14:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • delete per elkman.--Aleph-4 19:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete unless you think everybody on the Web deserves their own Wikipedia page. I notice that none of the "keeps" above gives any good reason to keep it. —johndburger 19:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • delete-pointless article -Reid A. 18:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete What? Since when do members of a message board get to have their own articles? Maybe userfy. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (T | C | @) 23:57, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.