Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wovle

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 ^talk July 5, 2005 01:48 (UTC)

[edit] Wovle

Marketing for Woolworths in Australia. A very odd article, perhaps it is an in-company review page? I couldn't find a copyvio, though it does feel like one. smoddy 12:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• I'm not sure if this is advertising or not, but there already exists an article for Woolworths Limited, so this one is really redundant. I dunno if "Wovle" is a slang term for Woolworths or something. If it is, a simple redirect should do the trick (I don't think there's any information in the article that needs preserving). If not, delete. -- Captain Disdain 12:12, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• A quick delete is more aproporate. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:19, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • None of those are criteria for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag. smoddy 12:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • If you say so. Woolworths Limited does exist. Article is about Woolworths Limited. Faster it gets deleted the better IMHO. Anyways... --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
      • Due process, my friend, due process. Let's not be accused of cabalism. smoddy 12:36, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Exterminate! as soon as possible. --Cool Cat ^{My Talk} 12:33, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• del I have no idea what a wovle is and this article doesn't contain that string. --MarSch 16:55, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I'm Australian, the word "wovle" isn't used at all, reads like an advertising screed.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.