Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worms weapons and tools
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. howcheng {chat} 18:39, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Worms weapons and tools
Fancruft. r3m0t talk 23:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Worms is an extremely popular game. The weapons from the game are covered in an encyclopaedic fashion and form a useful resource. Incidentally, quoting from Fancruft, Generally speaking, the perception that an article is fancruft can be a contributing factor in its deletion, but it is rarely the sole factor. If this was a list of levels in Worms, or character names, or documentation of minute details of gameplay, I might agree. But a picture and simple description of each weapon? Harmless. Stevage 00:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. --ZeroOne 00:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. We are not GameFAQs. --Apostrophe 01:29, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Wonderful page. A major addition to Worms scholarship. Why would we want to delete this? -- JJay 01:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, reasons as above Run! 10:55, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Worms is a rather popular game, and one article for ALL its weapons that are featured in ALL its games is the least we can do for it. -- SoothingR(pour) 15:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, article is well worth the space. -- Raelus 19:54, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
-
- Comment: See Pokémon move, Pokémon damage formula and Pokémon Abilities for some reference. Yikes...Stevage 03:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Keep!, As per above. Popular game & if the main worms article is ever separated into singular game articles, this article will prove most invaluable. Spawn Man 02:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.