Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worms schemes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 19:05, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Worms schemes

Not notable/fancruft. r3m0t talk 00:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Weak keep/merge into Worms (game). Tufflaw 00:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep if need be clean-up. Serious approach to worms schemes demonstrated here. -- JJay 01:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Take this stuff to Gamefaqs. Flyboy Will 02:36, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fancurft that belongs on GameFAQs. --Apostrophe 03:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not GameFAQs. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:35, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. I was surprised by the quality and proper style of writing – not the usual game cruft – however none of this information is encyclopaedic as it is not notable. Merge is not really practical due to the already long length of Worms (game). I have qualified my vote with "weak" because I suppose it doesn't hurt that much to keep it, provided that someone shows that they feel strongly about keeping this information. --Qirex 03:43, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. Well done, but such information for a specific game is not encyclopedic even under a broad definition.--Bkwillwm 05:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, helps to improve users' understanding of the game. Kappa 08:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge into Worms (game)--MONGO 09:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, this page was originally part of the Worms (computer game) page; I split it off because it was too big. On second thought this may come well under fancruft. I shall rescue the content, and stick it on my worms website instead. An external link can be provided from the schemes section of the main Worms article. Run! 10:53, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Done! Run! 16:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, It's an encyclopedia, not a GameFAQ. Agnte 13:50, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with Worms (game) in a shortened form that quickly goes over the main idea of each scheme.--Aleron235 20:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Does not even refer to the game. So the reader does not know what it is about. Too esoteric 82.38.97.206 21:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)mikeL
Try the first sentence ;) Run! 21:19, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.