Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Without Cancer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Philippe | Talk 05:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] World Without Cancer

World Without Cancer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Micro-stub that is empty, unsourced, and making no claims of notability whatsover, by an author just nuked at AFD -- and yet, somehow, isn't a speedy candidate. Calton | Talk 18:35, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Delete A Google search returns over 2 million hits, but most of the few I checked are book reviews, the author's website, or places like amazon.com. Unless a claim to notability can be made, and some good independent sources can be found, then delete. Mr Senseless (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Book reviews can be used to establish notability if there are enough of them (2-3) by reliable sources (say, if the book was reviewed in the New York Times, Book Review, or some other established entity). Do you have links to the book reviews? ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 01:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (2nd nomination), the book's author, for some drama, sockpuppets, etc. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. That the book has been revised and reprinted 23 years after it was first published suggests some notability. Unfortunately, it is not a make-or-break clue, and, in the absence of other clues, I am forced to conclude that the book has no more of a valid claim of notability that its author does, and that the reprinting simply reflects the fact someone had money to lose. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 21:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. no evidence of notability presented. --Fredrick day (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.