Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Independent News Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] World Independent News Group

This article is not regarding a notable subject. Johnwwatson 00:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• delete not notable-only 205 ghits. The related Lisa Guliani below is much more notable. M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 00:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this non-notable conspiracy theorist group today! Article comes complete with POV statements in practically every sentence and patent nonsense misrepresented as fact in the rest. Imban 01:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Imban. Montco 03:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Deleteper Imban -- although it may make us part of the "Great Conspiracy," I frankly don't care. The POV in this article is truly amazing. --N Shar 04:30, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As Oswald said on In Living Color, it's a C-O-N.....spiracy! Wildthing61476 05:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per Imban. NauticaShades 17:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and would someone go through the see also bios and nom those which should be deleted? JoshuaZ 02:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Imban. BrownHornet21 05:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above; non-notable and heavy on the POV. (Who names a group like this with fringe viewpoints WING, anyhow? It's just begging to have "nuts" added...) Tony Fox (arf!) 16:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.