Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World's largest airlines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non admin closure. JulesH 07:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] World's largest airlines

World's largest airlines (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

{{{text}}} Pdbailey 23:10, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy keep - Ummm....? Can you give us a reason?Cool Bluetalk to me 23:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Article uses the internationally authoritative IATA as its reference, so we have RS'es. Passenger totals are often reported in newspapers, so verifiability is not a problem, and I think notability will not be a problem to establish if it isn't already manifest. At the time of this !vote, the nominating user has not provided a rationale behind this AfD, so these arguments are necessarily nonspecific. Antelan talk 23:34, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep some lists are encyclopedic, and this is a good example. The information is presented in valuable ways that could not be done in a category, one of the basic considerations, and the material is important. DGG (talk) 23:35, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep, no reason given. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 23:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but rename to List of airlines by size or List of largest airlines. The current name isn't suitable for a list, and "World" is unnecessary, since all lists deal with the "world" unless the article name is specific to an area. Crazysuit 02:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep per no reason given, and DGG's arguments. Resolute 02:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep. I don't see any problems with verification or notability. Useight 06:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.