Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Work time-out

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 05:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Work time-out

Work time-out (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Looks like either a hoax or original research, no sources and cannot find any to support existence of this concept Davewild 11:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. WP:NN - no WP:RS, only WP:OP. --Evb-wiki 13:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete - possibly valid/notable concept but WP:OR, WP:RS are major issues.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. IP198 21:35, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Neologism or hoax. Bearian 02:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.