Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wordalicious

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Result : Speedy delete as A1 + A7 JoJan 08:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wordalicious

Wikipedia is not a dictionary - is not 3.A usage guide or slang and idiom guide

• Speedy.--Peta 01:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• I wish that was a speedy candidate. Unfortunately, it's not. Delete as per nom. Zetawoof^(ζ) 01:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Devotchka 02:00, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per my nom....or is it a vanity page (author of article credits his own humble self as the inventor of the word). Ahhh, too many choices, all saying 'delete'. ॐ Priyanath 02:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete A1, A7; if it doesn't qualify, then a standard delete will do. Hobbeslover 02:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, A7. --Terence Ong 03:36, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy lame attempt at a vanity page. JohnM4402 04:57, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.