Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wootatrocity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mostly Rainy 03:16, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wootatrocity

Non-encyclopedic woot.com fancruft. Article was deproded. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 01:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Do not delete If Cleveland Steamer can get wikied, so can wootatrocity. There's no reason not to leave this be. Nickinglis 22:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Note I don't think anybody would have a real problem with a redirect...

Note Just had to share, the deprod reason saying it wasn't WP:NEO: Etymology: stemming from wootatross, analogy to Rime of The Ancient Mariner's albatross.

• Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 02:28, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Non-notable neologism. Rohirok 03:14, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Unsourced, non-notable --Shirahadasha 03:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I love woot, but this takes it too far.Gillespee 05:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable neologism. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 07:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Dictionary definition of neologism confined to a single website. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Nigel ^(Talk) 12:21, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Palffy 14:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fancrufty (WP:FAN) Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 04:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.