This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 15:27, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
381 Google hits but seems to be some sort of vanity joke. Philthecow 02:31, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable neologism, possible vanity. Megan1967 04:42, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete (or redirect to l33t) Radiant! 12:12, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Neologism. utcursch 12:16, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, vanity neologism, self-promotion. Wyss 18:55, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, vanity neologism. Johntex 19:38, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.