Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodstock 2009

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck 00:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Woodstock 2009

Woodstock 2009 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Pure speculation Brianga 04:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong delete. WP:CRYSTAL. Realkyhick 04:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. The article itself states, "being planned by four facebook groups and one myspace group. The location for this event is not confirmed yet." It practically writes its own reasons for deletion. Iotha 05:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • Further comment: all those Facebook groups are fairly small; the largest has 449 members, and the other three are in the 100s. Iotha 05:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Iothiania. Maxamegalon2000 05:17, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - this isn't happening. The power of Facebook cannot possibly face down the power that was the horrible mess the last woodstock turned into. As such, it's crystal-ballery. --Haemo 07:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete You're right the power of face book cannot do this. Most bands are minor, and the article is in terrible shape as it is. Oh yeah, it's speculation. James Luftan 16:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Comment The one reference is from a forum! James Luftan 16:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Very Strong Delete The only references are forums, Google sponsers ads for "tickets" (read: fake), This isn't happening. It hasn't been confirmed anywhere by anyone outside of these MySpace and Facebook pages. No bands have been confirmed, no news reports. Hence, only speculation. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Doc Strange 18:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Very strong delete per above. No confirmation, no reliable sources, and no way that Facebook is going to produce a future Woodstock. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:49, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt until it's been confirmed by more reliable sources. Social networking sites don't count. — Dale Arnett 19:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, unless the creator of the article actually has fortune-telling abilities. ZOUAVMAN LE ZOUAVE 20:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete as pure crystalballery. The article pretty much admits it's speculation ... a location hasn't been selected yet. I think it's snowing outside ... hopefully an admin agrees. Blueboy96 22:48, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete pure speculation, probably not even notable when it does occur. T Rex | talk 01:26, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete per WP:CYRSTAL and it is doubtful that Facebook would do this.--JForget 01:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Don't Delete The article as it is now written is from a different source than the old one. This IS happening, because I have discussed it with land owners, and band managers. Obviously I can't give you all the details because we are years away, but things are going well. Furthermore, there are many big name bands on that list, you might notice.
  • Don't Delete Even if the festival hasn't been confirmed yet. It's considered a popular rumor. I believe the festival is happening, but most in here are right, we still need evidence. LuigiFan11 —Preceding comment was added at 08:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.