Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodham High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:56, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Woodham High School

Don't you think it's a ltitle bit unnotable? (preceding unsigned comment by 68.91.113.252 20:22, July 9, 2005 UTC)

Also, there is some false information in the article. How can you win the gold in the 2008 Olympics if we are in year 2005? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 07:16, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Nvm, I corrected it. It does have one notable alumni, and it can be expanded. Keep. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 07:18, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, continue to expand.--BaronLarf 16:37, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep verifiable and NPOV schools. DoubleBlue (Talk) 18:14, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep on nominating these schools for VfD and I'll keep on keeping. :-) — RJH 18:38, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Why not have wikipedia be a great resource? What's wrong with that? Themindset 19:23, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Jimbo's view is clear enough. Wikipedia has room for school articles. If you think it's biased, re-word it! Robdurbar 19:43, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
    • Read the comments. I don't see so much as one person saying it is biased. The editor who pointed out that it isn't possible to win a medal in the 2008 olympics before 2008 voted keep. And, as much as I respect Wikipedia's benevolent dictator and god-king, one snippet of an email from 2 years ago does not totally end all debate. Consensus is clear; schools nominated will not be deleted. Thus I will refrain from nomination. When they are nominated, I can still vote delete.--Scimitar parley 20:44, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable.--Scimitar parley 20:44, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedia is not a place where people decide which school they want to send their kids to. It's fine to mention in Justin Gatlin's article that he went there, but aside from him, there's nothing notable here. --Idont Havaname 22:25, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • keeep this too please wikipedia is not paper Yuckfoo 23:33, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, indicates notability. Gazpacho 01:55, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Obvious keep. Nominator should be drawn and quartered. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 01:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and delist. Since when do we allow anonymous posts to VfD? This is trolling, plain and simple. —RaD Man (talk) 02:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
    • Since when have we removed their nominations? We don't. It looks like you need another reading of WP:AGF, as I see no evidence of trolling. Plenty of valued contributors have made nominations that ended in unanimous keeps, and this one isn't even that. --Dmcdevit·t 05:30, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep important social institution. Grace Note 04:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep for the purpose of ending school VfD debates. Xoloz 05:12, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Not another one. CalJW 10:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, one famous alumni plus a couple unique programs doesn't add up to notability for me (few schools have the same exact curriculum). Exceptional newsworthiness and/or alumni/academic achievements should be required, eg Whitney High School. Dcarrano 14:00, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - seems decent enough to me, could do with some expansion. -- Lochaber 14:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I wish more school stubs looked like this one. - Lucky 6.9 22:49, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Aardvark. WP:NPA. --Carnildo 03:58, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep seems notable enough for me, though needs expansion Salsb 15:42, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Article which states next to nothing about notability. Attacked by hurricane?...try harder. Mandel 15:47, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.