Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wood Lock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS — rewrite has achieved a lot, but evidently not persuaded all. -Splash^talk 23:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wood Lock

Advertising. No claim of notability. User:Zoe|^(talk) 03:33, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Does appear to be advertising a product: http://estore.websitepros.com/1117792/Search.bok?category=Wood+Lock Nothing to suggest that it is particularly notable. -- (aeropagitica)  03:39, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, advertising. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-03 04:31Z
• Keep - it is part of Category:Ointments and is not advertising anything. It is more a list of different traditional Chinese medicines/treatments than anything else. Maybe they are very popular in Asia, because Wood Lock had 170,000+ bottles shipped to the US in 1994-1996 (to Chinese herbalist stores)? --Phanton 05:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but Expand. If we already have an ointments category we might as well make it as complete as possible. The article no longer appears to be advertising. Dan 19:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Nice cleanup, Phantom. Appears very non-AFD-y now. :) Turnstep 04:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 05:18, 4 January 2006 (UTC).
• Delete as Quarl and nomination. Oliver Keenan 22:12, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non notable Dustimagic 20:28, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.