Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Won Institute of Graduate Studies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete as copyvio. Stifle (talk) 17:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Won Institute of Graduate Studies

Won Institute of Graduate Studies (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Small, specialized graduate institution. Article gives no reliable third-party sources to establish notability or back up claims in text, a Google News search gives this article, which contains a reference so passing and brief you'd be advised to use your browser's "find" feature rather than scanning the text. Thomjakobsen 17:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

• Keep' Just remove the spam. all institutions of higher education are notable. DGG (talk) 03:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Removing the spam, realised the whole article was a copyvio. Tagged as such. Thomjakobsen 13:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete if in fact is is COPYVIO. But DGG is right, higher education institutions are inherently notable. CRGreathouse (t | c) 14:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

• From what I can gather, it is not yet accredited and its main course (acupuncture) is vocational in nature, so I don't see how this is inherently notable whereas a similarly-sized training business is not. Thomjakobsen 14:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.