Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women in Dragon Ball

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Women in Dragon Ball

There are PLENTY of character list pages for Dragon Ball already. This one is just pushing it too far. Plough | talk to me 15:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete listcruft, fancruft, cruftcruft. Vizjim 16:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Uhhhh, OK Delete as above :) Dlohcierekim 16:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as above. -- stubblyhead | T/c 16:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Ed (Edgar181) 17:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per everyone Metros232 17:26, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. —Mets501talk 22:18, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Not Delete this is further breaking down the character list, ie just women Bikes302 23:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete listcruft, randomcrapcruft. M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. DarthVader 23:52, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is not listcruft. Actually, the article can be more than just a list of characters, it can contain info about Women in Dragon Ball, that's a notable subject. More, if we have lists of Namekians and things like that, this one is also valid. At least the content of all that lists could be merged into a main article, but never deleted. Currently, the main article is just a list of links to other lists, therefore, deleting them would be disruptive. Along with that, the nomination doesn't state any good reasons, it seems more like a personal opinion on the subject. I'm not saying that this is the better way to list the characters, I'm just saying that I find no good reason to delete it. Afonso Silva 00:03, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as it stands, it's clear listcruft, and I can't imagine anything more useful than "There's not a lot of girl main characters in DB". Danny Lilithborne 01:12, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
If you can't imagine anything better, that's lack of creativity. Right now, your lack of creativity is not a reason to delete articles. Afonso Silva 12:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, let's see something that's not a roundabout way of saying "There's not a lot of girl main characters in DB". Wikipedia's not a place for fan interpretations. And it's not nice to insult people. Danny Lilithborne 13:07, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.