Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfowitz Doctrine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep Renata3 05:55, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wolfowitz Doctrine

User:Walter Görlitz suggested speedy deletion, but I believe it does not fall under a CSD. Beginning AFD. EdwinHJ | Talk 17:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete: "A psudo-name given to the..." Given by who? Keep - Has potential Tom Harrison (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Term gets 12,000 googles and needs to be explained. Never a speedy and the user who tagged this should learn about the other templates available. -- JJay 20:20, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. Per JJay. Perhaps with a (sources?) tag for the time being.Obina 20:36, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - Definately Verifiable. -Satori (talk) 22:57, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Plenty of stuff on it out there. - FrancisTyers 23:50, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep & expand, would benefit from see also's and such. Scoo 11:21, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep & expand - Not sure why it was marked for deletion, but then again, I'm a newbie (and the original author). The information is definately verifiable and neutral point of view. I've been tyring to find the original document to study it more and to link it. I agree that this need "see also's" as well references but I can't see the lack of identifying who coined the term "Wolfowitz Doctrine" as reason for deleting it. If you google it you get over 12k hits. Anyway, any advice appreciated. I'm going to try to work on it more over this comming week. --Daniel Santos 06:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand EdwinHJ | Talk 08:02, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.