The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Delete, hoax, no evidence of such a being. Looks like it's been around before. Budgiekiller 19:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete, recreation of deleted content (if that doesn't stand, delete as hoax, unverifiable, whatever). Trebor 00:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete, for all the reasons Trebor has pointed out. John Vandenberg 00:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.