Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizzrobe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge summarized content into Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series and delete the rest. These articles fail many of the criteria at WP:FICT, and Wikipedia is not a guide to all things Zelda (or any other game or fictional work). I've tried to incorporate a representative piece of each article into the more general Enemies one; editors who would like access to the deleted material for the purpose of doing a more extensive rewrite may contact me on my talk page. As a side note, the material seems to have been preserved at http://egamia.com/wiki/ . Tijuana Brass (talk) 07:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

This applies to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octorok, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moblin, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gohma, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizalfos, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poe (The Legend of Zelda), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stalfos and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wizzrobe.

[edit] Wizzrobe

Wizzrobe (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is just repetition of plot and character elements of various Legend of Zelda game articles. It has no notability on its own, and will not be able to develop into an article of its own. As such, its just duplication in an in-universe way. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:54, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge - I agree with the nominator that it "will not be able to develop into an article of its own" and is not notable outside of the games from which it came, therefore the reasonable thing seems to be to put it (back?) into Enemies in The Legend of Zelda series in a much reduced form. A simple deletion looks like it would leave a blank spot in that more comprehensive article. ◄Zahakiel► 19:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 19:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete since this all OR and nothing is sourced there will be nothing to merge. Ridernyc (talk) 16:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
    • The original game manuals could be used as a reliable source, as could official Nintendo websites on the game series. Some longstanding fan sites might rise to the level of reliable sources as well. 76.97.163.77 (talk) 05:53, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Transwikied and Delete moved to the Encyclopedia Gamia edit the article here --Cs california (talk) 08:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge - As per Zahakiel. .:Alex:. 10:23, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, fails WP:FICT for fictional characters. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:33, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge per above. - Koweja (talk) 18:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge - As per Zahakiel. Knowitall (talk) 04:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.