Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witthaya Hloagune

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP per WP:SNOW and WP:N (non-admin closure). SeanMD80talk | contribs 02:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Witthaya Hloagune

Witthaya Hloagune (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Poorly written article on Non-notable . Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 13:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

  • The article is poorly formatted, yes, but the subject is definitely notable. He played more than 100 matches for the Thailand national football team. Keep. AecisBrievenbus 13:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, bad article but he certainly seems notable. Just look at the articles in the other languages about him, they're huge. --Him and a dog 13:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Nominator has no understanding of site policies, and is nominating for AfD once a minute. Charles Matthews (talk) 14:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per above and comment. Can we add a line to the WP:N criteria to the effect that if Niaz(Talk • Contribs) nominates an article for deletion then that is strong prima facie evidence that the subject can be assumed to have notability? AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, as the people above said, this is a bad article but is notable under the athlete requirements of WP:BIO. Redfarmer (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - he clearly meets notability. matt91486 (talk) 17:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. It is called a stub. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 19:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC) Needs cites. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 19:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. The article needs sources and lots of work, but if it is true that the person has played 100+ matches and has articles in other languages, that is notable in my book. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Now obvious snowball keep AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.