Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Witness-pioneer.org

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 19:31, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Witness-pioneer.org

Non notable site ranked 318,000 or so by Alex [1]. gren グレン 07:20, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep

Consider this:

most shias that are online know what answering-ansar.org is, still it is ranked 2,198,338. And ansar.org, the famous Shia hate site has 152,302 and the very very very very famous Shia al-islam.org has only 55,912, i dont know if 318,000 is so bad... Consider allaahuakbar.net has 427,446.

I mean that you must have reasonable expectations of what a Muslim site is going to rate, its not gona rate like mcdonalds.com with 6,043 or CocaCola.com with 7,864. The very famous Salafi site islam-qa.com gets 11,098. In my own view, its not to much to want a article for all the above sites... I mean, how much does that cost WP? 1 mb? less? Also, it went up 92,880...--Striver 12:34, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Lol, look at this: alexia.com : 565,473. Alexa.com is even more non-notable than Witness-pioneer.org :P --Striver 13:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

My view is that of those Al-Islam.org is notable because... well, I really think it is... just about the most major Shia site I've seen... like Sunni Path is notable I believe... (although I can see why others would want to delete it...) Islam.com is ranked 48,000 but I think it's less notable than the 180,000 ranked Sunni Path... but, this all means very little.... linkforsex.com is ranked 36,000 but I don't think it's notable... gren グレン 21:36, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. It has been established that Wikipedia is not a web directory; this site does not meet keep criteria and the Alexa traffic rank is poor. And BTW, you link to alexia.com when you say that it is laughable... Try useing stats about alexa.com to criticise it, not alexia.com. Just a suggestion. --Bob 18:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
comment You missundertand me :) I did not mean that Alexa.com is laughable, in contrary, i belive it is a woderfull site. My argument was that having a net rating of 300 000 with Alexa.com is not a valid argument for not having a article, since Alexa.com in it self has a rating of 500 000, yet still it has its own article. So i argue that the 300 000 rating is not a valid argument for deleting it in it self, rather that an case-to case decision needs to be made. And i argue that Witness-pioneer.org is a profesional Sunni site that is profesional and notable. --Striver 22:24, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
i publicly apologise for accusing Bob of being a suckpupet, i misstok his contribution list [2] and i am also involved in a conflict with some other users. Sorry! --Striver 00:06, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable. I should perhaps add that I'm the person that Striver suspects of using sockpuppets. Zora 07:05, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.