Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Withington Cotton House

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:53, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Withington Cotton House

Withington Cotton House (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable building - the only information I can find is on maps. As sources are not cited I am unable to verify the information, and the article appears to contain original research/speculation, which is likely to be inaccurate. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 17:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable building about which little concrete is known. 'Appears' is used a lot. Dreamspy (talk) 18:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable; google's finding no mention of this building. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete "Little is known about Withington Cotton House, as there appears to be little or no record of the house" The article itself makes my argument for me TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 20:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Renee (talk) 22:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• If there's no information about the house, and no sources that say it exists, why do we have an article about it? What does Wikipedia know that local geographers don't know? I smell a hoax. Delete. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 04:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.